Proposition 137 Arizona 2025 Proposal. NAIOP Arizona Prop 479 YouTube Proposition 137 was referred to the ballot by the Legislature. Some have said the proposal is an effort to protect Arizona Supreme Court Justices Clint Bolick and Kathryn H
Arizona Proposition 137 What to know about voting on judges from fightingirishwire.usatoday.com
By contrast, Proposition 137 is a legislature-referred proposal that would eliminate the power held by voters for fifty years to assess and hold the judiciary accountable. Live video debate of Arizona's Proposition 137 — about ending term limits for judges — hosted by the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission and the Arizona Media Association.
Arizona Proposition 137 What to know about voting on judges
A "yes" vote supported this constitutional amendment to: end term limits for state supreme court justices and superior court judges; provide that justices can hold office during good behavior as determined by a judicial review commission;; eliminate retention elections based on terms for the Arizona Supreme Court, court of appeals, and some superior courts, including those for Nov 137 would also give legislators authority to order investigations against judges suspected of "a pattern of malfeasance," though the proposal does not define what activities would.
Homepage Will of the People Arizona. The proposal has ignited fierce debate, not just between political parties but also within conservative circles. Progress Arizona, a progressive advocacy and lobbying organization, requested that the high court block the ballot measure and prevent it from going.
Arizona Proposition 137 cuts voters out of how judges are retained Phoenix New Times. Arizonans overwhelmingly voted against it, with a whopping 77.4% of voters voting no on it with well over half the estimated. Arizona's judicial system could face a dramatic shift with Proposition 137 on the November 2024 ballot, which seeks to eliminate retention elections for judges